The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte LUBERT STRYER and SERGEY ZOZULYA
____________
Appeal 2007-18191
Application 09/886,055
Technology Center 1600
____________
Decided: August 27, 2007
____________
Before DONALD E. ADAMS, LORA M. GREEN, and NANCY J. LINCK,
Administrative Patent Judges.
Opinion by ADAMS, Administrative Patent Judge. Dissenting Opinion by
Linck, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 involves claims 23-33. While
Appellants’ Brief identifies claim 24 as withdrawn from consideration
1 Appellants’ representative failed to appear for the scheduled June 5, 2007
hearing. Accordingly, we treat Appellants’ failure to appear as a waiver of
their request for oral hearing (MPEP § 1209). Accordingly, we considered
this appeal on Brief.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013