Ex Parte Fang et al - Page 1



                         The opinion in support of the decision being entered today                          
                                   is not binding precedent of the Board.                                    

                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                            
                                               ____________                                                  
                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                              
                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                                   
                                               ____________                                                  
                                            Ex parte YE FANG,                                                
                            YULONG HONG, JOYDEEP LAHIRI, FANG LAI,                                           
                         JINLIN PENG, BRIAN L. WEBB, and ANN M. FERRIE                                       
                                               ____________                                                  
                                             Appeal 2007-1824                                                
                                          Application 10/639,718                                             
                                          Technology Center 1600                                             
                                               ____________                                                  
                                         Decided: August 23, 2007                                            
                                               ____________                                                  


                Before TONI R. SCHEINER, DONALD E. ADAMS, and NANCY J.                                       
                LINCK ,  Administrative Patent Judges.                                                       
                ADAMS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                          

                                         DECISION ON APPEAL                                                  
                      This appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 involves claims 1-18 and 43-51,                      
                the only claims pending in this application.  We have jurisdiction under 35                  
                U.S.C. § 6(b).                                                                               






Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013