The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte JENNIFER LU, NICOLAS J. MOLL,
and THOMAS E. KOPLEY
____________
Appeal 2007-1893
Application 10/946,753
Technology Center 2800
____________
Decided: September 5, 2007
____________
Before JEAN R. HOMERE, JAY P. LUCAS, and JOHN A. JEFFERY,
Administrative Patent Judges.
JEFFERY, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
Appellants appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the Examiner’s
rejection of claims 1, 3-16, 25-37, and 39-43. We have jurisdiction under 35
U.S.C. § 6(b). We affirm-in-part. Also, we enter new grounds of rejection
under 37 C.F.R. § 41.50(b) for claims 7 and 30-32.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013