Appeal 2007-1893 Application 10/946,753 DECISION We have sustained the Examiner's rejections with respect to claims 1, 3-6, 9-16, 25-29, 33-37, and 39-43. We have not, however, sustained the Examiner’s rejections of claims 7, 8, and 30-32. Furthermore, we have entered new grounds of rejection for claims 7 and 30-32. Therefore, the Examiner’s decision rejecting claims 1, 3-16, 25-37, and 39-43 is affirmed- in-part. This decision contains new grounds of rejection pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 41.50(b). Section 41.50(b) provides that “[a] new ground of rejection . . . shall not be considered final for judicial review.” Section 41.50(b) also provides that the Appellants, WITHIN TWO MONTHS FROM THE DATE OF THE DECISION, must exercise one of the following two options with respect to the new ground of rejection to avoid termination of the appeal as to the rejected claims: (1) Reopen prosecution. Submit an appropriate amendment of the claims so rejected or new evidence relating to the claims so rejected, or both, and have the matter reconsidered by the examiner, in which event the proceeding will be remanded to the examiner. . . . (2) Request rehearing. Request that the proceeding be reheard under § 41.52 by the Board upon the same record. . . . No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with this appeal may be extended under 37 C.F.R. § 1.136(a)(1)(iv). 20Page: Previous 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013