The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding
precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte KOUZO UFUJINO et al.
____________
Appeal 2007-1941
Application 10/363,159
Technology Center 2600
____________
Decided: August 28, 2007
____________
Before RICHARD E. SCHAFER, ADRIENE LEPIANE HANLON, and
JAMES T. MOORE, Administrative Patent Judges.
SCHAFER, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
1 Applicant appeals from the final rejection of Claims 1-27, 30, 32 and
2 33. 35 U.S.C. § 134(a). We have jurisdiction. 35 U.S.C. § 6(b).
3 An examiner rejected the claims under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first
4 paragraph, as failing to be supported by the original written description. We
5 affirm.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013