Ex Parte Wood et al - Page 2


                 Appeal 2007-1963                                                                                       
                 Application 10/121,226                                                                                 

                                                 THE INVENTION                                                          
                        The disclosed invention pertains to an electronic power supply, and,                            
                 more particularly, to a method and apparatus for powering an electronic                                
                 device from an ambient (i.e., naturally occurring, as opposed to man-made)                             
                 electrostatic field gradient (Specification 2).                                                        
                        Independent claim 20 is illustrative:                                                           
                        20.           An ion powered platform, comprising:                                              
                                      a vehicle;                                                                        
                                      an electrical load carried by the vehicle; and                                    
                                      means for generating electrical energy from an ambient                            
                                      electrostatic field gradient.                                                     

                                                THE REFERENCES                                                          
                 Gregory                           US 4,146,800                 Mar. 27, 1979                          
                 Naarmann                          US 4,738,757                 Apr. 19, 1988                          
                 McLuckey                          US 4,849,628                 July 18, 1989                          
                 Veliadis                          US 5,942,806                 Aug. 24, 1999                          
                 Hoyt                              US 6,419,191 B1              July 16, 2002                          

                                                THE REJECTIONS                                                          
                        Claims 1, 2, 7, 12, 20, 21, 23, 24, 26-32, 34, 35, 37, 42, 44-49, and 51                        
                 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over the                                 
                 teachings of Veliadis in view of Hoyt.                                                                 
                        Claims 15, 25, 33, 40, and 50 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a)                           
                 as being unpatentable over the teachings of Veliadis in view of Hoyt, and                              
                 further in view of Gregory.                                                                            

                                                           2                                                            

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013