1 The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
2 for publication in and is not binding precedent of the Board.
3
4 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
5 ___________
6
7 BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
8 AND INTERFERENCES
9 ___________
10
11 Ex parte VLADIMIR R. PISARSKY
12 ___________
13
14 Appeal 2007-2005
15 Application 10/066,110
16 Technology Center 3700
17 ___________
18
19 Decided: May 24, 2007
20 ___________
21
22 Before MURRIEL E. CRAWFORD, HUBERT C. LORIN and
23 ANTON W. FETTING, Administrative Patent Judges.
24 FETTING, Administrative Patent Judge.
25 DECISION ON APPEAL
26
27
28
29 STATEMENT OF CASE
30 This appeal from the Examiner’s rejection of claims 15-25, 28, 29, and 31, the
31 only claims pending in this application, arises under 35 U.S.C. § 134. We have
32 jurisdiction over the appeal pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 6.
33
34 We AFFIRM.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013