Appeal 2007-2005
Application 10/066,110
1 PRIOR ART
2 The prior art references of record relied upon by the Examiner in rejecting the
3 appealed claims are:
4 Rosenberg U.S. 6,366,272 B1 Apr. 2, 2002
5 (filed Nov. 3, 1999)
6 Perkins U.S. 2002/0165026 A1 Nov. 7, 2002
7 (filed May 1, 2001)
8 Yoshida EP 1 029 5691 A2 Aug. 23, 20008
9
10 REJECTIONS
11 Claims 15-18, 21, and 22 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as
12 anticipated by Yoshida.
13 Claims 23, 24, 28, and 31 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as obvious
14 over Yoshida.
15 Claim 29 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as obvious over Yoshida
16 and Perkins.
17 Claims 19, 20, and 25 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as obvious over
18 Yoshida and Rosenberg.
19
1 The Examiner incorrectly typed this as EP 1 029 559 A2 (Answer 4) – the 559 is
actually 569.
3
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013