The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is
not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte KIYOSHI SUNADA and
KOSUKE WATANABE
____________
Appeal 2007-2049
Application 10/475,223
Technology Center 1700
____________
Decided: August 22, 2007
____________
Before BRADLEY R. GARRIS, PETER F. KRATZ, and
CATHERINE Q. TIMM, Administrative Patent Judges.
TIMM, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
Appellants appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134(a) from the Examiner’s
decision rejecting claims 4-10, 12, and 14-21. We have jurisdiction under
35 U.S.C. § 6(b).
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013