The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte WAYNE I. KNIGGE, KAREN E. MCCLURE,
PATRICK J. SUMPMANN and WILLIAM E. ARCHIBALD
____________
Appeal 2007-2060
Application 09/945,318
Technology Center 1700
____________
Decided: September 25, 2007
____________
Before EDWARD C. KIMLIN, CHUNG K. PAK, and PETER F. KRATZ,
Administrative Patent Judges.
PAK, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the
Examiner's refusal to allow claims 1, 4 through 17, 21, 22, 24, 27 through
29, 32 through 35, 37 through 39, 41 through 43, 45 through 57, 59 through
65, and 77 through 79, all of the claims pending in the above-identified
application. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 6.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013