Ex Parte Barkac et al - Page 1

                         The opinion in support of the decision being entered today                           
                                   is not binding precedent of the Board.                                     

                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                             
                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                               
                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                                    
                                      Ex parte KAREN A. BARKAC,                                               
                                        DEIRDRE D. RAGAN, and                                                 
                                        KAREN S. RECHENBERG                                                   
                                             Appeal 2007-2062                                                 
                                           Application 10/360,263                                             
                                          Technology Center 1700                                              
                                           Decided:  July 16, 2007                                            

                Before BRADLEY R. GARRIS, CHARLES F. WARREN, and                                              
                THOMAS A. WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                
                WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                           

                                         DECISION ON APPEAL                                                   
                      This is a decision on an appeal under 35 U.S.C.  134 from the                          
                Primary Examiner’s non-final rejection of claims 1 through 38, which are                      
                the only claims pending in this application.  Although the action appealed                    
                from was a non-final rejection, we have jurisdiction since the claims have                    

Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013