The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte KAREN A. BARKAC,
DEIRDRE D. RAGAN, and
KAREN S. RECHENBERG
____________
Appeal 2007-2062
Application 10/360,263
Technology Center 1700
____________
Decided: July 16, 2007
____________
Before BRADLEY R. GARRIS, CHARLES F. WARREN, and
THOMAS A. WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judges.
WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the
Primary Examiner’s non-final rejection of claims 1 through 38, which are
the only claims pending in this application. Although the action appealed
from was a non-final rejection, we have jurisdiction since the claims have
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013