Ex Parte Yoseloff et al - Page 4



             Appeal 2007-2074                                                                                   
             Application 10/658,863                                                                             

             cannot be legally available as prior art under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as long as the                   
             present application is entitled to the benefit claimed under 35 U.S.C. § 120 of the                
             filing dates of 10/016,436, 09/249,118, 09/170,092, 08/889,919, and 08/504,023.                    
             If the Examiner shows that the present application is not entitled to the benefit                  
             claimed under 35 U.S.C. § 120 of the filing dates of 10/016,436, 09/249,118,                       
             09/170,092, 08/889,919, and 08/504,023, the Examiner will have shown that the                      
             present application has an effective filing date (September 9, 2003) that is more                  
             than one year after de Keller’s issue date and will have supported the premise                     
             underlying the prima facie cases of unpatentability that de Keller is legally                      
             available as prior art under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b).                                                   
                   Entitlement to the benefit of filing dates of earlier applications is contingent             
             on satisfying the conditions set forth in 35 U.S.C. § 120:                                         
                   Benefit of earlier filing date in the United States                                          
                    An application for patent for an invention disclosed in the manner                          
                   provided by the first paragraph of section 112 of this title in an                           
                   application previously filed in the United States, or as provided by                         
                   section 363 of this title, which is filed by an inventor or inventors                        
                   named in the previously filed application shall have the same effect, as                     
                   to such invention, as though filed on the date of the prior application,                     
                   if filed before the patenting or abandonment of or termination of                            
                   proceedings on the first application or on an application similarly                          
                   entitled to the benefit of the filing date of the first application and                      
                   if it contains or is amended to contain a specific reference to the                          
                   earlier filed application.  No application shall be entitled to the                          
                   benefit of an earlier filed application under this section unless an                         
                   amendment containing the specific reference to the earlier filed                             
                   application is submitted at such time during the pendency of the                             
                   application as required by the Director.  The Director may consider the                      
                   failure to submit such an amendment within that time period as a waiver                      
                                                       4                                                        



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013