Appeal 2007-2111 Application 09/921,204 1 Appellant directs us to In re Wright, 848 F.2d 1216, 6 USPQ2d 1959 (Fed. 2 Cir. 1988), in support of Appellant's position. In In re Dillon, 919 F.2d 688, 3 693-94, 16 USPQ2d 1897, 1902 (Fed. Cir. 1990), the court, in an in banc 4 decision, overruled the holding in In re Wright, relied upon by Appellant. 5 Appellant [Dillon] cited In re Wright, 848 F.2d at 1219, 6 USPQ2d at 1961, 6 for the proposition that a prima facie case of obviousness requires that the 7 prior art suggest the claimed compositions’ properties and the problem the 8 applicant attempts to solve. Dillon, 919 F.2d at 692-93, 16 USPQ2d at 1901. 9 Appellant Dillon asserted that none of the references relates to the problem 10 she confronted, Dillon, 919 F.2d at 693-94, 16 USPQ2d at 1902. The court 11 stated that: 12 it is not necessary in order to establish a prima facie case of 13 obviousness that both a structural similarity between a claimed and 14 prior art compound (or a key component of a composition) be shown 15 and that there be a suggestion in or expectation from the prior art that 16 the claimed compound or composition will have the same or a similar 17 utility as one newly discovered by applicant. To the extent that 18 Wright suggests or holds to the contrary, it is hereby overruled. 19 20 Dillon, 919 F.2d at 692-93, 16 USPQ2d at 1901. 21 The Supreme Court’s statement in KSR that “The first error of the 22 Court of Appeals in this case was to foreclose this reasoning by holding that 23 courts and patent examiners should look only to the problem the patentee 24 was trying to solve. 119 Fed. Appx., at 288. The Court of Appeals failed to 25 recognize that the problem motivating the patentee may be only one of many 26 addressed by the patent's subject matter. The question is not whether the 27 combination was obvious to the patentee but whether the combination was 28 obvious to a person with ordinary skill in the art. Under the correct 15Page: Previous 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013