Ex Parte Cavage et al - Page 1



                  The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding                       
                                            precedent of the Board.                                               

                         UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                
                                                 ____________                                                     
                              BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                  
                                           AND INTERFERENCES                                                      
                                                 ____________                                                     
                    Ex parte MARK JOSEPH CAVAGE and GARY DALE WILLIAMS                                            
                                                 ____________                                                     
                                               Appeal 2007-2116                                                   
                                            Application 10/318,000                                                
                                            Technology Center 2100                                                
                                                 ____________                                                     
                                         Decided: September 19, 2007                                              
                                                 ____________                                                     

                Before LANCE LEONARD BARRY, HOWARD B. BLANKENSHIP, and                                            
                SCOTT R. BOALICK, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                   

                BLANKENSHIP, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                         


                                           DECISION ON APPEAL                                                     
                       This appeal involves claims 1-6 and 8-21, the only claims remaining                        
                in the application.  We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. §§ 6(b), 134(a).                        








Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013