Ex Parte 5694604 et al - Page 108


                Appeal 2007-2127                                                                                  
                Reexamination Control No. 90/006,621                                                              
                it thereafter required the enormous programming skills and resources of                           
                Microsoft Corp. thirteen (13) years to implement concurrent ('as you type')                       
                spelling checking in 1995; and fifteen (15) years to implement concurrent                         
                ('as you type') grammar checking in 1997" (Br. 75).                                               
                       None of Patent Owner's 1982, 1985, 1990, or 1994 applications                              
                provide any details of how to perform lexical or syntactic analysis of a                          
                natural language, such as spelling and grammar checking.  (As noted in the                        
                written description rejection, infra, the '604 patent does not even mention the                   
                concept of lexical or syntactic analysis of a natural language.)  We do not                       
                see how spelling and grammar checking as you type is enabled unless it is                         
                considered wholly within knowledge of one of ordinary skill in the art, in                        
                which case it is difficult to see how Patent Owner can argue that he solved                       
                the problem of concurrent spelling and grammar checking.  See In re Reiffin,                      
                199 Fed. Appx. at 966-67 (affirming enablement rejection for "concurrent                          
                lexical analysis, i.e., spell checking or grammar checking as one types").                        
                Patent Owner is trying to cover word processing inventions that he did not                        
                himself invent.  There is no enablement rejection before us, but the                              
                Examiner did reject the analysis claims based on lack of written description.                     
                       If Patent Owner's contention is that somehow the bare invention of                         
                "multithreading" is the solution that allowed Microsoft to produce spelling                       
                and grammar checking as you type, then Patent Owner fails to explain why,                         
                since Microsoft knew about true multithreading in 1988 when it designed                           
                OS/2, it took seven years to provide the features in Word.  The motivation                        
                and capability for spelling checking as you type clearly existed in the art                       
                before Patent Owner mentioned it in the 1990 application.  See Nguyen,                            
                Advanced Programmer's Guide to OS/2, page 9 (In 1989: "All of us are                              

                                                       108                                                        

Page:  Previous  101  102  103  104  105  106  107  108  109  110  111  112  113  114  115  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013