Ex Parte 5694604 et al - Page 118


                Appeal 2007-2127                                                                                  
                Reexamination Control No. 90/006,621                                                              
                       disclosing the same subject matter.  Common subject matter must be                         
                       disclosed, in both applications, either specifically or by an express                      
                       incorporation-by-reference of prior disclosed subject matter.  Nothing                     
                       in section 120 itself operates to carry forward any disclosure from an                     
                       earlier application.  In re de Seversky, supra at 674, 177 USPQ at                         
                       146-47.  Section 120 contains no magical disclosure-augmenting                             
                       powers able to pierce new matter barriers.  It cannot, therefore "limit"                   
                       the absolute and express prohibition against new matter contained in                       
                       section 251.                                                                               
                       Facts                                                                                      
                1.     The 1982 and 1985 applications and the '603 patent (1990 application)                      
                state that "[l]exical analysis is performed by a 'scanner' and is the process of                  
                forming a sequence of source code bytes into meaningful symbols or tokens,                        
                somewhat like forming a sequence of characters into English words" (1982                          
                application, page 1; 1985 application, page 2; '603 patent, col. 3, lines 1-5)                    
                and that "[t]hese [lexical and syntactic] analyses are very much like parsing                     
                the words of an English sentence" (1982 application, page 1; 1985                                 
                application, page 2; '603 patent, col. 3, lines 13-14).                                           
                2.     The two preceding statements are omitted in the 1994 application.                          
                3.     The 1990 application added disclosure not found in the 1982 and 1985                       
                applications that the code being entered or edited at the keyboard "may                           
                constitute either a formal or a natural language" ('603 patent, Abstract).                        
                4.     The 1990 application also added disclosure not found in the 1982 and                       
                1985 applications that stated (now at '603 patent, col. 2, lines 31-55):                          
                             The language or other alphanumeric code processed by the                            
                       present invention may be either a natural language such as English, or                     
                       a formal language such as a programming language, or the numbers                           
                       and strings of a spreadsheet or database.  Both natural and formal                         
                       languages are generally written in the same ASCII code, and the                            

                                                       118                                                        

Page:  Previous  111  112  113  114  115  116  117  118  119  120  121  122  123  124  125  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013