Ex Parte 5694604 et al - Page 125


                Appeal 2007-2127                                                                                  
                Reexamination Control No. 90/006,621                                                              
                third piece of "controlling software" to control the input data (id.).  It is                     
                stated that "[e]ven though it is well known in the art that an input device                       
                (keyboard) has software to input data, . . . in the disclosure of '604' patent,                   
                there is no controlling software to . . . 'process previously input data' (like a                 
                word processor . . .)" (id.).  The Examiner apparently reasons that the later                     
                added limitation of a first thread "to process previously input data"                             
                "is implying that the previously input data is being manipulated by a                             
                'controlling software' which did not exist before" (emphasis omitted) (id.).                      
                       Patent Owner argues that the Examiner apparently confuses the                              
                "controlling software to input data," which enters data into the system, with                     
                the "first thread to process previously input data," which is the compiler in                     
                the illustrative embodiment (Br. 82).  It is argued that "the 'controlling                        
                software' to which the amended claim 14 refers is the keyboard input routine                      
                of the computer" (Br. 82).  It is argued that the 1994 application discloses a                    
                keyboard for inputting data, and, by the Examiner's admission that it was                         
                known that a keyboard has software to input data, the limitation is inherently                    
                disclosed (Br. 82-83).                                                                            
                       The claim language does not recite that the controlling software is                        
                manipulating "previously input data," as interpreted by the Examiner.                             
                Claim 14 recites that the "first thread" and "another thread" "process                            
                previously input data," which is input by the controlling software.  Although                     
                the Examiner states that "it is well known in the art that an input device                        
                (keyboard) has software to input data," we find no software disclosed as part                     
                of the keyboard itself in the '604 patent. The '604 patent describes                              
                transferring data from the keyboard using a UART (universal asynchronous                          
                receiver-transmitter).  Nevertheless, Figure 5 shows an "input character"                         

                                                       125                                                        

Page:  Previous  118  119  120  121  122  123  124  125  126  127  128  129  130  131  132  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013