Ex Parte 5694604 et al - Page 130


                Appeal 2007-2127                                                                                  
                Reexamination Control No. 90/006,621                                                              
                patent to do what is been claimed in claim 60" (Final Rejection 35-36                             
                ¶ II.3(J)).  The Examiner finds that the '604 patent discloses (at col. 10,                       
                lines 20-42) that when there is an error, the temporary entries are discarded                     
                and the compiler pointer is moved back to the end of the previous line and                        
                data is not processed "while said data remains stored in the buffer" (id.).                       
                Again, the Examiner feels that Patent Owner is attempting to "morph" a                            
                "compiler line editor" into a general "word processor" (Final Rejection 36).                      
                       As to group 29 (claims 70 and 72), the Examiner finds that the                             
                limitation "instructions executable to modify said data while each modified                       
                datum remains stored within said buffer" (claim 70) lacks written description                     
                support because the '604 patent discloses that if a line contains an error, the                   
                temporary entries are discarded, rather than remaining stored                                     
                (Final Rejection 44-45 ¶ II.3(R)).  Since claim 72 does not have this                             
                limitation, it is improperly included in the rejection.                                           
                       Patent Owner argues that the editor is a full screen editor which is                       
                capable of modifying the source code after it is entered (Br. 86).  It is argued                  
                that the descriptions of the editor changing an old pause mark to a blank                         
                when it inserts a new pause mark, or returning the compiler pointer to the                        
                end of the previous line if an error is found in the last line of code currently                  
                being entered, are merely suggested methods for delimiting the portion of                         
                the source code that the compiler is to process, and has nothing to do with                       
                the editor or the contents of the source code buffer (Br. 87-89; Br. 91).                         
                       We agree with Patent Owner that the '604 patent discloses an editor                        
                that can modify stored data for the reasons stated with respect to Group 2.                       
                We agree that changing the pause mark to a blank or returning the compiler                        
                pointer to the end of the previous line relate to the method of delimiting the                    

                                                       130                                                        

Page:  Previous  123  124  125  126  127  128  129  130  131  132  133  134  135  136  137  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013