Appeal 2007-2127 Reexamination Control No. 90/006,621 grammar of a natural language code. The Examiner finds that the '604 patent only describes lexical and syntactic analyses of formal programming languages. The rejections involve the following limitations (claims in bold indicate claims that were "overlooked"): "words of a language" (claims 39, 41, 42, 47, 48, 53); "words of a natural language" (claim 51); "words of English sentences" (claim 40, claims 43 and 49 are similar); "words forming English sentences (claims 40, 54, and 55); "words and sentences" (claim 39); "sentences of a language" (claim 56); "syntactic analyses for parsing said sentences" (claim 56); "syntactic analyses for parsing said words [of the English language]" (claim 43); "lexical analysis for checking the spelling of said words" (claim 39, claims 48 and 52 are similar); "syntactic analyzer for checking the grammar of said sentences" (claim 74); "lexical and syntactic analyses for parsing said [English] sentences by checking the spelling and grammar of said words and said sentences" (claims 40, 54, and 55, claims 49 and 62 are similar); " instructions executable to analyze the words [of a natural language] for conformity with said rules" (claim 51); "lexically analyzing each identifier to check the identifier for correct spelling upon its formation" (claim 63; claim 64 because it depends on claim 63); "lexical analyzer to form the characters into sequences constituting a word and thereupon to check the spelling of each of said words upon its formation" (claim 65); "checking the spelling of said word upon a determination that the last character of the word has been input" (claim 66); 134Page: Previous 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013