Ex Parte 5694604 et al - Page 137


                Appeal 2007-2127                                                                                  
                Reexamination Control No. 90/006,621                                                              
                Prof. Noam Chomsky for analyzing natural language were later used by                              
                compiler designers for analyzing the lexical and syntactic elements of                            
                computer programming languages, which language contained ordinary                                 
                English language words (Br. 91; Br. 93), that the operation of the disclosed                      
                program compiler is "analogous . . . to the earlier studies of lexical and                        
                syntactic analysis of natural languages" (Br. 93), and that origin and history                    
                of lexical and syntactic analysis of computer programs were intertwined                           
                with that of natural languages (Br. 94).  It is argued that "[b]y 1982, persons                   
                skilled in the art would have known that the lexical and syntactic analyzers                      
                of the illustrative embodiment would be applicable to both natural and                            
                computer programming languages" (Br. 100).  Patent Owner refers to                                
                Dr. Ligler's declaration dated April 12, 2004, at ¶¶ 29-32 for his opinion that                   
                "[t]he teachings of the Detailed Description section of the specification of                      
                the '604 patent would inherently be seen as applicable, to a person of                            
                ordinary skill in the art of the Reiffin '603 and '604 patents in 1982, to the                    
                computer-assisted spelling and grammar checking of a document written in                          
                the English language" (Opinion G, April 2004, declaration, page 14).                              
                       The '604 patent does not disclose or reasonably suggest that Patent                        
                Owner possessed the invention of lexical and syntactic analysis of natural                        
                languages.  "One shows that one is 'in possession' of the invention by                            
                describing the invention, with all its claimed limitations, not that which                        
                makes it obvious."  Lockwood v. American Airlines Inc., 107 F.3d at 1572,                         
                41 USPQ2d at 1966.  Patent Owner's and Dr. Ligler's description of the                            
                relationship between analyses of computer programming languages and                               
                natural languages is no substitute for an express description in the '604                         
                patent.  If extrinsic evidence of what was known to those skilled in the art                      

                                                       137                                                        

Page:  Previous  130  131  132  133  134  135  136  137  138  139  140  141  142  143  144  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013