Ex Parte 5694604 et al - Page 136


                Appeal 2007-2127                                                                                  
                Reexamination Control No. 90/006,621                                                              
                processed by the program may be a natural language such as English, or the                        
                numbers and strings of a spreadsheet or database, and that lexical analysis                       
                may be used to determine correct spelling and syntactic analysis may be                           
                used to determine correct grammar of a natural language code.  This omitted                       
                subject matter cannot be added back into the '604 patent to provide written                       
                description support without showing that it is inherently present in the 1994                     
                application, as filed.  By omitting this subject matter in the '604 patent,                       
                Patent Owner clearly indicated his intention that it was not his invention.                       
                       Nevertheless, Patent Owner relies on the omitted subject matter.  For                      
                example, Patent Owner argues that "[i]t was inherent to one of ordinary skill,                    
                as of 1994, reading the original 1994 application (or as of 1982, reading the                     
                original Detailed Description of the 1982 application): that the disclosed                        
                conventional lexical and syntactic analyses were analogous to those used in                       
                efforts to analyze or describe natural languages (e.g., English)" (Br. 91).                       
                However, the 1982 disclosure comparing the analyses to forming English                            
                words and parsing English sentences is not in the original 1994 application                       
                or the issued '604 patent.  As another example, Patent Owner argues that                          
                "[a]s also added by amendment to the '604 specification, and as disclosed in                      
                Patent Owner's 1982 application, 1985 application, 1990 application and                           
                issued '603 patent: 'These [lexical and syntactic] analyses are very much like                    
                parsing the words of an English sentence'" (emphasis omitted) (Br. 92).                           
                Again, this quoted statement was omitted from the original 1994 application                       
                and '604 patent and cannot be reintroduced without adding new matter.                             
                       Patent Owner argues that the techniques for analyzing formal                               
                computer programming languages are related to those for analyzing natural                         
                languages.  It is argued that techniques originally created by linguists such as                  

                                                       136                                                        

Page:  Previous  129  130  131  132  133  134  135  136  137  138  139  140  141  142  143  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013