Ex Parte Bany et al - Page 1



                            The opinion in support of the decision being entered today                                   
                                        not binding precedent of the Board.                                              

                          UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                      
                                                    ____________                                                         
                                BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                       
                                              AND INTERFERENCES                                                          
                                                    ____________                                                         
                                            Ex parte STEPHN W. BANY,                                                     
                                                  JAMES P. DIZIO,                                                        
                                             PATRICIA J.A. BRANDT,                                                       
                                             JANICE R. MANORE and                                                        
                                                 JUDITH A. GREEN                                                         
                                                    ____________                                                         
                                                  Appeal 2007-2144                                                       
                                               Application 10/147,015                                                    
                                              Technology Center 1700                                                     
                                                    ____________                                                         
                                            Decided: September 25, 2007                                                  
                                                    ____________                                                         
                 Before EDWARD C. KIMLIN, CHUNG K. PAK, and PETER F. KRATZ,                                              
                 Administrative Patent Judges.                                                                           
                 PAK, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                       

                                              DECISION ON APPEAL                                                         
                        This is a decision on an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the                                   
                 Examiner's final rejection of claims 1 through 7, 9 through 17, 19 through                              
                 23, 25, 26, and 28, all of  the claims pending in the above-identified                                  
                 application.  We have jurisdiction pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 6.                                           




Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013