Appeal 2007-2144 Application 10/147,015 a release coating disposed on the fibrous material of the porous substrate; wherein the release coating comprises a thermoplastic silicone-containing polymer comprising at least about 30% silicone segments and 1-5% carboxylic acid moieties, wherein the thermoplastic silicone-containing polymer is deposited out of a composition comprising water; and wherein the release coating is penetrated into no more than the top 20% of the fibrous material. As evidence of unpatentability of the claimed subject matter, the Examiner has relied upon the following references: Seth US 6,129,964 Oct. 10, 2000 Leir EP 0 380 236 A2 Jan. 8, 19902 The Examiner has rejected claims 1 through 7, 9 through 17, 19 through 23, 25, 26, and 28 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as unpatentable over the combined disclosures of Seth and Leir. The Appellants appeal from the Examiner’s decision rejecting the claims on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a). ISSUES 1. Does substantial evidence support the Examiner’s finding that the prior art relied upon would have taught or suggested using a pressure- sensitive adhesive backing layer containing the claimed fiber content within the meaning of 35 U.S.C. § 103(a)? 2 Both the publication date and/or the teachings of EP 0 380 236 referred to in the Answer dated June 30, 2006 and the Final Office dated December 1, 2005 indicate that the Examiner has relied on EP 0380 236 A2. 3Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013