Ex Parte Mendenhall et al - Page 1



                          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today                               
                                     is not binding precedent of the Board.                                        

                         UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                 
                                              ________________                                                     
                               BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                  
                                           AND INTERFERENCES                                                       
                                              ________________                                                     
                        Ex parte IVAN V. MENDENHALL and ROBERT G. SMITH                                            
                                              ________________                                                     
                                               Appeal 2007-2195                                                    
                                            Application 10/172,166                                                 
                                            Technology Center 1700                                                 
                                              ________________                                                     
                                           Decided:  August 21, 2007                                               
                                              ________________                                                     
                Before EDWARD C. KIMLIN, BRADLEY R. GARRIS, and                                                    
                CHARLES F. WARREN, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                   
                KIMLIN, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                               

                                           DECISION ON APPEAL                                                      
                       This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1-15, 17-20, and                       
                31-36.  Claims 26-30 have been withdrawn from consideration.  Claims 1                             
                and 34 are illustrative:                                                                           





                                                                                                                  



Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013