The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE __________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES __________ Ex parte PIERRE GRAFF __________ Appeal 2007-2206 Application 10/181,977 Technology Center 1700 __________ Decided: July 24, 2007 __________ Before TONI R. SCHEINER, ERIC GRIMES, and LORA M. GREEN, Administrative Patent Judges. GRIMES, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 involving claims to an embossed sheet of tissue paper. The Examiner has rejected the claims as anticipated and obvious. We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b). We affirm. BACKGROUND In the manufacture of toilet paper or paper towels, “it is known to produce paper sheets consisting of several plies of absorbent paper, forPage: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013