Appeal 2007-2254
Application 10/383,115
On this record, Appellant’s claim 1 is directed to the discovery of a
new benefit of the old process taught by Amin. In my opinion, this newly
discovered benefit of Amin’s process does not render Appellant’s process
patentable.
Accordingly, I agree with the majority’s decision to affirm the
rejection of claim 1 under 35 U.S.C. § 103. Claims 2, 3, 7, 9, 14, 15, 17, 20,
21, 30, 31, 47, and 48 fall with claim 1.
lbg
MICHAEL BEST & FRIEDRICH, LLP
ONE SOUTH PINCKNEY STREET
P O BOX 1806
MADISON WI 53701
9
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Last modified: September 9, 2013