Appeal 2007-2488
Application 10/081,483
1 claim 14 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Frutin I in
2 view of Kohler as applied to claims 12 and 13 and further in view of Berg.
3 (4) Whether Farr has shown that the Examiner erred in rejecting
4 claims 17 and 18 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Frutin
5 I as applied to claims 1, 3, 5-8, 15, and 16 and further in view of Frutin II.
6 (5) Whether Farr has shown that the Examiner erred in rejecting
7 claims 1, 4, 9, and 10 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over
8 Hoffman in view of Denton.
9 (6) Whether Farr has shown that the Examiner erred in rejecting
10 claim 11 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Hoffman in
11 view of Denton as applied to claims 1, 4, 9, and 10 and further in view of
12 Bergman.
13
12
Page: Previous 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013