The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding
precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________________
Ex parte JOACHIM ARLT and KARL-HERMANN BUSSE
__________________
Appeal 2007-2501
Application 10/026,9171
Technology Center 2800
________________
Decided: August 24, 2007
________________
Before ADRIENE LEPIANE HANLON, RICHARD TORCZON, and
SALLY C. MEDLEY, Administrative Patent Judges.
MEDLEY, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
1 A. Statement of the Case
2 Applicants appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from a final rejection of
3 claims 1-4, 6-9, 11, 12, 14, and 15. We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C.
4 § 6(b).
1 Application for patent filed 21 December 2001. The real party in interest
is VenTec Gesellschaft für Venturekapital und Unternehmensberatung.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013