The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte LOUIS A. CAMPBELL and ROBERT M. CASANOVA
__________
Appeal 2007-2558
Application 10/205,948
Technology Center 3700
__________
Decided: August 7, 2007
__________
Before DONALD E. ADAMS, ERIC GRIMES, and RICHARD M.
LEBOVITZ, Administrative Patent Judges.
LEBOVITZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the final rejection of claims 1-12.
We have jurisdiction of this appeal under 35 U.S.C. 6(b). We affirm.
STATEMENT OF CASE
Claims 1-12, which are all the pending claims, are rejected over prior
art. The Examiner relies on the following evidence of unpatentability:
Knoepfler US 5,217,460 Jun. 8, 1993
Hoogeboom US 5,752,972 May 19, 1998
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013