The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte JOSEPH F. BRINGLEY
and GARY N. BARBER
__________
Appeal 2007-2677
Application 10/622,229
___________
Decided: 27 September 2007
___________
Before FRED E. McKELVEY, Senior Administrative Patent Judge, and
ADRIENE LEPIANE HANLON and MICHAEL P. TIERNEY,
Administrative Patent Judges.
HANLON, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
A. STATEMENT OF CASE
Appellants appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from a final rejection of
claims 1, 10, 13-21, and 25, the only claims remaining in the application on
appeal.
We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b).
The application on appeal was filed on July 18, 2003.
The real party in interest is Eastman Kodak Company.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013