The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte DAVID A. WHITE ____________ Appeal 2007-2807 Reexamination 90/006,5111 Patent 5,156,811 (Technology Center 1700) ____________ Decided: September 13, 2007 ____________ Before FRED E. McKELVEY, Senior Administrative Patent Judge, and JAMESON LEE and MICHAEL P. TIERNEY, Administrative Patent Judges. LEE, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL A. Statement of the Case This is a decision on appeal by a Patentee under 35 U.S.C. § 134(a) and 35 U.S.C. § 306 from a rejection of claims 1-19 and 21-41 in Reexamination 90/006,511 of Patent 5,156,811. We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b). 1 The Patent under reexamination is based on Application 06/734,533, filed July 23, 1991. The real party in interest is Molecular Bioproducts, Inc.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013