The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________________
Ex parte JOHN LEE HAMMONS, RAPHAEL WARREN,
RONALD BOSMAN VISSCHER, JOSEPH ANTHONY GATTO,
BRIAN FRANCIS GRAY and AMY MARIE PRICE
____________________
Appeal 2007-2825
Application 10/262,036
Technology Center 3700
____________________
Decided: 29 June 2007
____________________
Before: FRED E. McKELVEY, Senior Administrative Patent Judge,
and SALLY C. MEDLEY and MICHAEL P. TIERNEY, Administrative
Patent Judges.
McKELVEY, Senior Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
1 A. Statement of the case
2 John L. Hammons, Raphael Warren, Ronald B. Visscher, Joseph A.
3 Gatto, Brian F. Gray and Amy Marie Price (hereafter "P&G") seek review
4 under 35 U.S.C. § 134(a) of a final rejection of claims 1-20 and 22, the only
5 claims remaining in the application on appeal.
6 We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b).
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013