Ex Parte Saito et al - Page 7



                 Appeal 2007-2863                                                                                      
                 Application 10/934,507                                                                                
            1           Thereafter, a mixture of m-xylylenediamine (0.75 part) and                                     
            2     diethylamine (0.09 part) was dissolved in DMAc so as to make a                                       
            3     concentration of 30%, and the solution thus obtained was dropwise added                              
            4     as a curing agent solution to the urethane prepolymer solution (100 parts by                         
            5     weight) vigorously stirred at room temperature to carry out a                                        
            6     polymerization reaction to obtain a polyurethane urea resin solution.  The                           
            7     amino groups [―NH2] on the amines react with the available isocyanate                                
            8     groups [―NCO] on the prepolymer to form urea groups                                                  
            9     [―NH―CO―NH-] whereas a hydroxyl group [―OH] reacts with an                                           
           10     isocyanate group [―NCO] to form a urethane group [―NH―CO―O―].                                        
           11     Accordingly, the product is both a polyurethane resin and a polyurea resin                           
           12     since it will have both urethane and urea groups.                                                    
           13           DMAc was evaporated and the polyurethane urea resin solution was                               
           14     dried to obtain a film-like sample having a thickness of 200 µm.                                     
           15           The hardness and tensile strength of the film are not reported.                                
           16                                                                                                          
           17                                      Final Rejection                                                     
           18           The Examiner rejected claims 1-16 as anticipated by, or as being                               
           19    unpatentable for obviousness, over Saito (WO).                                                        
           20           The Examiner made the following findings and observations.                                     
           21           Saito describes, in Example 1, a prepolymer made from an isocyanate                            
           22    [MDI] and a mixture of low unsaturation polyols having a number average                               
           23    molecular weight of greater than 8000 and a [hydroxyl] functionality of                               
           24    about 2.01.  Final Rejection, page 2.                                                                 



                                                          7                                                            

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013