Appeal 2007-2863 Application 10/934,507 1 use of TDI vis-à-vis MDI is significant. Asahi Glass had the burden of 2 showing that the difference is not significant. 3 Shimoma also uses polyoxypropylene polyols having an unsaturation 4 of 0.100 meq/g. The Examiner notes that the polyols described by Saito 5 [Polyol A and Polyol B] have lower unsaturation levels [0.029 and 0.025] 6 and that Example 6 of the Asahi Glass specification shows that the 7 unsaturation level is critical for obtaining the specified relationship between 8 tensile strength and hardness. Examiner's Answer, page 4. No Reply Brief 9 was filed responding to the Examiner's finding. On this record, we have no 10 reason to question the Examiner's uncontested finding concerning 11 unsaturation being critical to the claims X>H/10 limitation. 12 The Shimoma experimental work uses a curing agent comprising a 13 mixture of equal mass parts of 1,4-butane diol [a dihydroxy compound] and 14 trimethylolpropane [a trihydroxy compound], and therefore a chain extender 15 having an average hydroxy functionality greater than 2 [somewhere between 16 >2 and <3]. Saito, on the other hand, used a mixture of diamino-compounds 17 as the extender and therefore an average functionality of 2. 18 Examiner's observation about the Rule 132 showing 19 As noted in our discussion of the Rule 132 showing, the Examiner's 20 observed numerous differences between the Shimoma experimental work 21 and Saito Example 1. 22 Based on those differences, the Examiner declined to credit the 23 experimental work. In short, the Examiner did not find the Shimoma 24 experimental work representative of Saito Example 1. 9Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013