Ex Parte Kamins et al - Page 11

               Appeal 2007-2983                                                                             
               Application 10/029,583                                                                       

               the dispersal of at least one molecule in a pore that is formed by the method                
               steps recited therein without any constraints on how one or more molecules                   
               are dispersed in or added to the pore.  As we noted above with respect to                    
               claim 47, Appellants have not fairly explained how the provision of an                       
               emitter in Kikuchi is not the provision of at least one molecule in the pore                 
               opening.  In this regard, representative claim 24 does not require that each                 
               nanopore only includes a single molecule.  As such, Appellants have not                      
               established reversible error in the Examiner’s rejection based on the                        
               arguments set forth in the Brief and the unsubstantiated and irrelevant                      


                                                                                                           
               and/or enables the complete preparation of a particular molecular electronic                 
               device via the claimed method, much less a general method for preparing a                    
               variety of such completed molecular electronic devices to the extent that the                
               claimed subject matter may be amended to require the formation of such a                     
               device.  In this regard, Appellants briefly discuss two widely differing prior               
               art techniques, and alleged shortcomings thereof in forming spaced holes in                  
               a substrate for placement of molecules therein (Specification 1-2).  Then,                   
               Appellants describe their claimed method for forming nanopores for                           
               deposition of materials therein, or for spacing or separating molecules                      
               therein.  In this regard and in the event of such further prosecution, the                   
               Examiner should determine if Specification paragraphs 0031 and 0032                          
               furnish enough detail as to how the pillars are selectively etched to form the               
               nanopores for compliance with § 112, first paragraph requirements.  Also,                    
               for example, the Examiner should determine if Specification, paragraphs                      
               0033-0036, including the brief reference to unidentified emerging teachings                  
               therein together with the remaining portions of the Specification satisfies the              
               § 112, first paragraph requirements for an enabling disclosure in making a                   
               workable molecular electronic device with molecules capable of switching                     
               in the presence of an electronic field.  We note that no Examples of the                     
               preparation of a workable molecular electronic device, much less one made                    
               according to the claimed method, are furnished in the Application                            
               Specification, as filed.                                                                     
                                                    11                                                      

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013