The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte KAY MIYAKAWA LIU and CRAIG MILLER
____________
Appeal 2007-3390
Application 10/143,915
Technology Center 1600
____________
Decided: July 31, 2007
____________
Before DONALD E. ADAMS, TONI R. SCHEINER, and
NANCY J. LINCK, Administrative Patent Judges.
ADAMS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 involves claims 4-7 and 9. The
only claims, claims 1-3, were withdrawn from consideration as based on
non-elected subjected (Br. 2). We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b).
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013