Ex Parte Kutilek et al - Page 1



                 The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding                  
                                          precedent of the Board.                                           

                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                            
                                              ____________                                                  
                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                             
                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                                  
                                              ____________                                                  
                                       Ex parte LUKE A. KUTILEK                                             
                                        And ROGER L. SCRIVEN                                                
                                              ____________                                                  
                                            Appeal 2007-4035                                                
                                          Application 10/007,979                                            
                                         Technology Center 1700                                             
                                              ____________                                                  
                                       Decided: September 26, 2007                                          
                                              ____________                                                  

               Before THOMAS A. WALTZ, PETER F. KRATZ, and                                                  
               JEFFREY T. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judges.                                              
               KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                          

                                         DECISION ON APPEAL                                                 
                      This is a decision on an appeal from the Examiner’s final rejection                   
               of claims 1-8, 32-41, 48, 49, and 52.  We have jurisdiction pursuant to                      
               35 U.S.C. §§ 6 and 134.                                                                      








Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013