The opinion in support of the decision is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte J. KIRK LEAPHART JR., C. MARK LEAPHART, CARLOS R.
SCHOOLCRAFT AND MICHAEL L. ERNST
____________
Appeal 2007-4073
Application 10/739,4171
Technology Center 3700
____________
Decided: September 28, 2007
____________
Before JAMESON LEE, RICHARD TORCZON, and MICHAEL P.
TIERNEY, Administrative Patent Judges.
TIERNEY, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
1 This is a 35 U.S.C. § 134 appeal in the above-referenced case2 of
2 claims 28-40, the only claims pending in this application. We have
3 jurisdiction over the appeal pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 6(b).
1 This application published as U.S. Published Application 2005/132479 on
June 23, 2005.
2 The real party in interest is J. Kirk Leaphart Jr. and C. Mark Leaphart. (Br.
at 1).
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013