The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte ANDREAS SCHLEGEL, PETER BAILLY, JURGEN KISCHKEWITZ AND KLAUS ROHBOCK ____________ Appeal 2007-4101 Application 09/962,972 Technology Center 1700 ____________ Decided: September 26, 2007 ____________ Before CHUNG K. PAK, PETER F. KRATZ, and LINDA M. GAUDETTE, Administrative Patent Judges. PAK, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the Examiner's final rejection of claims 1 through 16, and 27, all of the claims pending in the above-identified application. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 6.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013