Ex Parte Rocha et al - Page 20

                Appeal 2007-1992                                                                               
                Application 09/318,447                                                                         

                      permanent memory of the client computer. The viewer can change or                        
                      update this information with the TV remote control. As such, the                         
                      viewer in Joseph's system does not log in to a server system to change                   
                      account information because the account information is stored at the                     
                      client computer. In fact, Joseph does not mention logging in to the                      
                      server computer, the client computer, or any other computer. By                          
                      contrast, Teper's system requires the user to log in before the user can                 
                      purchase an item and before the user can change account                                  
                      information. For example, when a user connects to a Service Provider                     
                      site and attempts to purchase an item, the Service Provider site                         
                      requires the user to manually enter their password before the purchase                   
                      is completed. Moreover, when a user connects to the Online                               
                      Brokering Service to change or review account information, the                           
                      Online Brokering Service requires the user to log in. Therefore,                         
                      Teper's system always requires the user to log in before purchasing an                   
                      item and before changing account information, and Joseph does not                        
                      mention logging in.                                                                      
                Appeal Br. 21-22. Emphasis added. Accordingly, there is no dispute that the                    
                prior art shows aspects of the invention claimed in claims 108, 151, and 176,                  
                “whereby [a] user does not need to log in to the server system when                            
                ordering the item, but needs to log in to the server system when changing                      
                previously supplied account information”. The question is whether one of                       
                ordinary skill in the authentication art would look to Joseph to modify an                     
                online purchasing method where no login is required and thus arrive at the                     
                claimed invention. This question depends on knowing the level of skill in the                  
                art and the knowledge a person of ordinary skill in the art would have had as                  
                of at least 1999 (i.e., the filing date of the application on appeal)                          
                in  access control mechanisms and as they relate to different levels of                        
                security. Without knowing the level of skill in the art and the knowledge a                    
                person of ordinary skill in the art would have had as of at least 1999, there is               
                no assurance, as the Examiner has reasoned, “that it would have been                           

                                                      20                                                       

Page:  Previous  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013