Appeal 2007-4234 Application 10/929,891 the claim would not have adequately enabled by the description of the invention provided in the specification of the application, we REVERSE the rejection of claims 1-19 under § 112, first paragraph. IV. Anticipation Claims 1-9, 14-15 and 19 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as anticipated by Ohkura. Appellant has not argued the separate patentability of claims 1-3, 5-9, 14-15 and 19. Therefore, we decided this issue on the basis of claims 1 and 4. 37 C.F.R. § 41.37(c)(1)(vii). A. Additional Findings of Fact [23] Ohkura discloses a chemical dispersant for treating highly viscous oil which comprises (a) a polyoxyethylene sorbit fatty acid ester having an HLB of 10-13, (b) a nonionic surfactant having an HLB of 2-6 and (c) a hydrocarbon solvent (Ohkura at 7-8, ¶ 8, and 18, ¶ 39). [24] Polyoxyethylene sorbit fatty acid esters having HLBs of 10-13 are said to show a high emulsification performance against highly viscous oil (Ohkura at 10, ¶ 12). [25] The HLB 2-6 nonionic surfactant is said to improve "soaking characteristics into highly viscous oil" (Okhura at 16, ¶ 33). [26] The hydrocarbon solvent may be a paraffin type solvent, a naphthalene type solvent, spindle oil, n-decane, kerosene or light oil (Ohkura at 8-9, ¶ 8). [27] The hydrocarbon solvent is said to be effective in reducing the viscosity of the highly viscous oil (Okhura at 16-17, ¶ 35). [28] According to Ohkura, the dispersant can be used for dispersion treatment of oil, without restriction as to the type of oil (Ohkura at 18, ¶ 39). 9Page: Previous 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013