The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte GARY STEPHENSON
__________
Appeal 2007-4245
Application 09/489,3101
___________
Decided: 26 September 2007
___________
Before ADRIENE LEPIANE HANLON, RICHARD TORCZON, and
MICHAEL P. TIERNEY, Administrative Patent Judges.
HANLON, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
A. STATEMENT OF CASE
Appellant appeals under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from a final rejection of
claims 23-31. We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b).
The Appellant’s invention is directed to a method of treating dental
erosion comprising orally administering to a mammal in need thereof a
beverage composition having a pH of less than about 5 wherein the beverage
composition comprises a polyphosphate compound.
1 The real party in interest is The Procter & Gamble Company.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013