Appeal No. 2007-4245 Application 09/489,310 A method of treating dental erosion comprising orally administering to a mammal a beverage composition having a pH of less than about 5; wherein the beverage composition comprises a compound having the structure: wherein n is an integer averaging from about 7 to about 100 and M, M’, and M’’ are each, independently, selected from the group consisting of sodium and potassium, and wherein the beverage composition is substantially free of calcium and fluoride. The Examiner found that the recited “method for treating dental erosion” requires only that the beverage be “orally administered” to a mammal which would have occurred in the prior art when the beverage was consumed by the mammal. Citing Jansen v. Rexall Sundown, Inc., 342 F.3d 1329, 68 USPQ2d 1154 (Fed. Cir. 2003), the Examiner stated that where a treatment preamble is recited, the phrase “in need thereof” must appear in the body of the claim to require administration to a particular individual requiring such treatment. Office Action dated March 17, 2004 at 4. The Examiner indicated that the rejection would be overcome if claim 23 were amended to read, “A method for treating dental erosion, comprising orally administering to a mammal in need thereof an effective amount of a beverage” (emphasis added). Office Action dated November 1, 2004 at 3; see also Office Action dated March 17, 2004 at 4. 5Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013