Ex Parte Stephenson - Page 5

               Appeal No. 2007-4245                                                                        
               Application 09/489,310                                                                      
                      A method of treating dental erosion comprising orally                                
                      administering to a mammal a beverage composition having a                            
                      pH of less than about 5; wherein the beverage composition                            
                      comprises a compound having the structure:                                           







                      wherein n is an integer averaging from about 7 to about 100 and                      
                      M, M’, and M’’ are each, independently, selected from the                            
                      group consisting of sodium and potassium, and wherein the                            
                      beverage composition is substantially free of calcium and                            
                      fluoride.                                                                            
                      The Examiner found that the recited “method for treating dental                      
               erosion” requires only that the beverage be “orally administered” to a                      
               mammal which would have occurred in the prior art when the beverage was                     
               consumed by the mammal.  Citing Jansen v. Rexall Sundown, Inc., 342 F.3d                    
               1329, 68 USPQ2d 1154 (Fed. Cir. 2003), the Examiner stated that where a                     
               treatment preamble is recited, the phrase “in need thereof” must appear in                  
               the body of the claim to require administration to a particular individual                  
               requiring such treatment.  Office Action dated March 17, 2004 at 4.                         
                      The Examiner indicated that the rejection would be overcome if claim                 
               23 were amended to read, “A method for treating dental erosion, comprising                  
               orally administering to a mammal in need thereof an effective amount of a                   
               beverage” (emphasis added).  Office Action dated November 1, 2004 at 3;                     
               see also Office Action dated March 17, 2004 at 4.                                           



                                                    5                                                      

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013