Hughes A. and Marilyn B. Bagley - Page 2

                  Mark Arth, for petitioners.                                                           
                  Jack Forsberg, for respondent.                                                        


            SCOTT, Judge: Respondent determined a deficiency in petitioners' income                     
            tax for the calendar year 1987 in the amount of $488,976.31.  The issues for                
            decision are:  (1) What portion, if any, of the amount of $1.5 million paid to              
            Hughes Bagley (petitioner) in settlement of a suit against Iowa Beef                        
            Processors, Inc. (IBP), is allocable to punitive damages; (2) whether the                   
            $500,000 in punitive damages paid to petitioner pursuant to a judgment against              
            IBP, and the portion, if any, of the $1.5 million paid to petitioner in                     
            settlement of his suit against IBP which is allocable to punitive damages, are              
            excludable from petitioner's income under section 104(a)(2)1 as damages                     
            received on account of personal injuries; (3) whether the portion of the legal              
            fees of $768,484.87 paid by petitioner during 1987 in connection with his suit              
            against IBP, which was a contingency fee based on a percentage of the                       
            recovery, is properly to be offset against the recovery and, therefore, not                 
            includable in income, or is a miscellaneous itemized deduction subject to the               
            adjustment for 2 percent of adjusted gross income under section 67(a); and (4)              
            whether the portion of the legal fees paid by petitioner in 1987, which was                 
            computed on an hourly basis, is deductible by petitioner on Schedule C or is                
            an itemized deduction to the extent deductible; (5) whether the amount of                   
            $48,575.34 of prejudgment and the amount of $282,772.41 of postjudgment                     
            interest paid to petitioner, pursuant to a judgment against IBP, are                        
            includable in petitioners' gross income.                                                    
                                           FINDINGS OF FACT                                             
                  Some of the facts have been stipulated and are found accordingly.                     
                  Petitioners, husband and wife, who resided in Sioux City, Iowa, at the                
            time of the filing of their petition in this case, filed their Federal income               

            1  All section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for                    
            the year in issue, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of                    
            Practice and Procedure, unless otherwise indicated.                                         




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011