Hughes A. and Marilyn B. Bagley - Page 3

                                                 - 3 -                                                  

            tax return (Form 1040) for the calendar year 1987 with the Internal Revenue                 
            Service Center at Atlanta, Georgia.                                                         
                  Petitioner was vice president of retail sales development for IBP from                
            October 1971 until July 1975.  In July 1975 IBP terminated petitioner's                     
            employment, and in October 1975 IBP and petitioner entered into a settlement                
            agreement resolving certain issues arising from the termination of                          
            petitioner's employment.  When petitioner left IBP he took with him numerous                
            documents (the Bagley documents), including IBP's weekly profit and loss                    
            statements, IBP's monthly production and sales reports, confidential legal                  
            memoranda, and memoranda outlining IBP's goals, marketing strategies, and                   
            pricing formulas.  In late 1976 and early 1977, petitioner met with various                 
            individuals who were interested in the activities of IBP, including several                 
            attorneys who were contemplating pursuing antitrust litigation against IBP.                 
            Petitioner discussed IBP's activities with the attorneys and provided them                  
            with access to the Bagley documents.  On June 7, 1977, IBP filed a suit                     
            against petitioner and others in the U.S. District Court for the Northern                   
            District of Iowa seeking $4 million in damages and injunctive relief,                       
            including recovery of the Bagley documents (the IBP suit).  The suit was Civil              
            No. 77-4040 and was entitled Iowa Beef Processors, Inc. v. Amalgamated Meat                 
            Cutters & Butcher Workmen of N. Am., et al.  The claims asserted in the suit                
            against petitioner by IBP were breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty,                
            causing and assisting in another's breach of fiduciary duty, and conspiracy.                
                  In late 1977 the Subcommittee on General Small Business Problems of the               
            U.S. House of Representatives' Committee on Small Business (the subcommittee)               
            initiated an investigation into the meat packing industry.  The subcommittee's              
            investigation focused in large part on the activities of IBP.  In the course                
            of its investigation, the subcommittee subpoenaed the Bagley documents and                  
            various witnesses, including petitioner, for oral testimony.  Petitioner                    
            testified before the subcommittee on July 23 and 24, 1979.  Petitioner's                    





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011