Mark R. and Diane R. Webb - Page 2

                                        - 2 -                                         
          amount of $2,885 with respect to petitioners' 1989 tax year.                
               Petitioners conceded all the adjustments in the notice of              
          deficiency.2  The issues for decision are:  (1) Whether                     
          petitioners, during 1989, realized a gain or loss under section             
          1001(a) on the foreclosure sale of real estate; (2) if                      
          petitioners realized a loss, whether petitioners are entitled to            
          a credit or refund for overpayment of their 1989 income tax under           
          section 6512; and (3) whether petitioners are liable for the                
          addition to tax under section 6651(a)(1).                                   
               At trial, the parties submitted this case fully stipulated.            
          All of the stipulated facts are so found, and those facts, with             
          the annexed exhibits, are incorporated herein by reference.  At             
          the time the petition was filed, petitioners' legal residence was           
          Alpine, Utah.                                                               
               Petitioners filed their 1989 Federal income tax return on              
          October 30, 1990.  On April 12, 1991, petitioners filed an                  
          amended return for 1989, claiming an ordinary loss of $75,379               
          resulting from the foreclosure sale of real estate, consisting of           
          a lot and improvements, owned by Mark R. Webb (petitioner).  On             


          2                                                                           
               These adjustments consist of the following:  (1) A reduction           
          in depreciation of $762; (2) a reduction in car and truck                   
          expenses of $319; (3) a reduction of Schedule C interest expense            
          of $3,699; (4) a reduction of telephone expenses of $513; and               
          (5) a reduction in Schedule A interest of $41.  Petitioners also            
          conceded that they were not entitled to a personal exemption                
          deduction for petitioners' son, Gregg.  There is a dispute as to            
          whether petitioners conceded the addition to tax under sec.                 
          6651(a)(1).  That issue is dealt with in the body of the opinion.           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011