Mark R. and Diane R. Webb - Page 9

                                        - 9 -                                         
          realized.  The sale of mortgaged property at a foreclosure sale             
          is treated as a sale or exchange from which the mortgagor may               
          realize gain or loss under section 1001.  Helvering v. Hammell,             
          311 U.S. 504 (1941).                                                        
               The parties agree that the foreclosure sale of the lot                 
          constituted a sale for tax purposes.  Id.  Furthermore, the                 
          parties stipulated that petitioner's basis in the foreclosed                
          property was $520,379.  In dispute is the "amount realized" on              
          the foreclosure sale that is to be applied against petitioner's             
          basis to determine the amount of gain or loss from the sale.                
               Petitioners contend that, pursuant to Aizawa v.                        
          Commissioner, 99 T.C. 197 (1992), affd. 74 AFTR2d par. 94-5493,             
          the amount realized is the amount of the foreclosure sale                   
          proceeds, or $450,000, resulting in a loss to petitioners of                
          $70,379, which is the excess of petitioner's basis of $520,379              
          over the amount realized of $450,000.  Respondent, on the other             
          hand, contends that petitioners realized a gain on the                      
          foreclosure sale under the Aizawa case.  More specifically,                 
          respondent contends that the amount realized must be the lesser             
          of the fair market value of the property or the amount of the               
          debt.  Respondent bases this argument on the ground that, after             
          the foreclosure sale, petitioner was discharged from any further            
          liability on the deficiency or unpaid portion of the judgment;              
          therefore, under section 1.1001-2(a)(1), Income Tax Regs., the              
          deficiency or unpaid portion of the judgment constituted income             




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011