Mark R. and Diane R. Webb - Page 7

                                        - 7 -                                         
          "docket" the judgment pursuant to this statutory provision.4                
          However, Citizens never released petitioner from his obligation             
          on the judgment; the judgment was never canceled from the public            
          records, and the parties stipulated that "Citizens Bank expected            
          Webb [petitioner] to pay the deficiency balance".                           
               At some point in 1988, Waddell, one of the debtors, filed              
          for bankruptcy and was discharged from his obligation on the                
          note.  Also, sometime in 1989, Truman, another debtor, filed for            
          bankruptcy and was discharged from his obligation on the note.              
          There is no evidence that either of these debtors made any                  
          payments on the note and/or the judgment.                                   
               The parties have stipulated that, at the time of the                   
          foreclosure sale, the adjusted basis of the foreclosed property             
          was $520,379, and the property had a fair market value of                   
          approximately $625,000.                                                     
               In December 1988, following the sale and adjudication of the           
          property to Citizens, petitioner entered into an agreement with             
          Citizens whereby petitioner agreed to be the listing agent for              
          the sale of the property.  Under the agreement, petitioner would            

          4                                                                           
               Under Utah law, petitioner had the right to redeem the                 
          property sold at the foreclosure, and the sheriff's sale was not            
          final until 6 months after the sale.  Utah R. Civ. P. 69 (1994).            
          Petitioner did not redeem the property, and the sale became final           
          on May 23, 1989.  Accordingly, petitioner did not deduct his loss           
          on the foreclosure sale of the property until tax year 1989, the            
          year the sale became final.  See R. O'Dell & Sons Co. v.                    
          Commissioner, 169 F.2d 247, 249 (3d Cir. 1948), affg. 8 T.C. 1165           
          (1949).  Respondent does not challenge that the sale was final in           
          1989, and that 1989 is the proper year for recognizing any gain             
          or loss from the sale for tax purposes.                                     



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011