- 7 - "docket" the judgment pursuant to this statutory provision.4 However, Citizens never released petitioner from his obligation on the judgment; the judgment was never canceled from the public records, and the parties stipulated that "Citizens Bank expected Webb [petitioner] to pay the deficiency balance". At some point in 1988, Waddell, one of the debtors, filed for bankruptcy and was discharged from his obligation on the note. Also, sometime in 1989, Truman, another debtor, filed for bankruptcy and was discharged from his obligation on the note. There is no evidence that either of these debtors made any payments on the note and/or the judgment. The parties have stipulated that, at the time of the foreclosure sale, the adjusted basis of the foreclosed property was $520,379, and the property had a fair market value of approximately $625,000. In December 1988, following the sale and adjudication of the property to Citizens, petitioner entered into an agreement with Citizens whereby petitioner agreed to be the listing agent for the sale of the property. Under the agreement, petitioner would 4 Under Utah law, petitioner had the right to redeem the property sold at the foreclosure, and the sheriff's sale was not final until 6 months after the sale. Utah R. Civ. P. 69 (1994). Petitioner did not redeem the property, and the sale became final on May 23, 1989. Accordingly, petitioner did not deduct his loss on the foreclosure sale of the property until tax year 1989, the year the sale became final. See R. O'Dell & Sons Co. v. Commissioner, 169 F.2d 247, 249 (3d Cir. 1948), affg. 8 T.C. 1165 (1949). Respondent does not challenge that the sale was final in 1989, and that 1989 is the proper year for recognizing any gain or loss from the sale for tax purposes.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011