Alfred P. Duffy - Page 5

                                   - NEXTRECORD  -                                    
               Petitioner filed a Federal income tax return (Form 1040) for           
          1990.  On his return, petitioner computed his tax liability using           
          the cash receipts and disbursements method of accounting.                   
               Petitioner received a Form W-2 from the school district                
          disclosing the payment of wages in 1990 in the amount of                    
          $66,254.66.  Petitioner did not attach such form to his return.             
          Rather, he attached Form 4852 (Substitute for Form W-2).  On such           
          form, as well as on the return itself, petitioner reported wages            
          in the amount of $55,355.76; i.e., $66,254.66 less net wages                
          withheld in the amount of $10,898.90.                                       
               Petitioner did not report the distribution from his American           
          Capital account on his return for 1990.                                     
          Respondent's Notice of Deficiency                                           
               In the notice of deficiency, respondent determined that                
          petitioner failed to report wages in the amount of $10,899.                 
          Respondent also determined that the distribution from                       
          petitioner's American Capital account was includable in                     
          petitioner's gross income.5  As a corollary, respondent                     
          determined that petitioner was liable for the 10-percent                    
          additional tax imposed by section 72(t).                                    
                                       OPINION                                        
               The issues for decision are whether petitioner failed to               
          report wages in the amount of $10,899 and whether petitioner is             

          5 See supra note 2 regarding petitioner's concession related                
          to this distribution.                                                       




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011