Alfred P. Duffy - Page 7

                                   - NEXTRECORD  -                                    
          liable for excess travel advances.  Specifically, petitioner                
          commenced an action in the trial court, and, following the                  
          dismissal of the action in January 1991, he appealed to the                 
          Appellate Division.  The Appellate Division ultimately affirmed             
          the trial court, but not until May 1992.  Thus, petitioner's                
          dispute with the school district was not resolved in 1990, the              
          taxable year in issue.                                                      
               Because there existed a genuine dispute between petitioner             
          and the school district in 1990 regarding petitioner's liability            
          for excess travel advances, it cannot be said that in 1990,                 
          petitioner constructively received the net wages withheld by the            
          school district during that year.  Cf. N. Sobel, Inc. v.                    
          Commissioner, 40 B.T.A. 1263 (1939).                                        
               Respondent cites Tucker v. Commissioner, 69 T.C. 675 (1978),           
          Kuntz v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1992-650, and Kasey v.                    
          Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1976-266, in support of her position.              
          As discussed below, respondent's reliance on these cases is                 
          misplaced.                                                                  
               In Tucker v. Commissioner, supra, the taxpayer was a teacher           
          who engaged in an illegal strike against a school district.  The            
          school district, acting pursuant to a State law that imposed a              
          monetary penalty on persons participating in illegal strikes,               
          withheld the penalty from the taxpayer's wages.  We held that the           
          withholding of the penalty resulted in income to the taxpayer.              
          We based our holding on the fact that the taxpayer incurred a               




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011